The Responsibility to Protect and the Afghan Refugee Crisis: Unveiling Gaps in International Law

• Amina Iqbal

  Author

The Taliban’s return to power in August 2021 triggered one of the most pressing humanitarian crises of recent years, raising urgent questions about refugee protection and forced displacement. Central to this debate is the principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), which emphasizes the duty of the international community to act when states fail to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. The Afghan case, however, underscores the persistent shortcomings in translating this principle into effective action. The rapid collapse of the Afghan government and the chaotic evacuation efforts revealed incoherence and inconsistency in international responses, exposing the gap between R2P’s theoretical commitments and its practical implementation. Vulnerable groups—including women, children, and minorities—remain disproportionately affected, while many states have struggled to provide asylum and adequate humanitarian assistance to Afghan refugees. This failure highlights the inadequacy of current international legal frameworks to address evolving refugee crises comprehensively. The Afghan experience demonstrates that R2P, in its current form, lacks the operational clarity and enforcement mechanisms required to ensure timely and coordinated intervention. Consequently, there is a pressing need for reform that bridges the divide between principle and practice, ensuring that future humanitarian crises are met with coherent, rights-based, and legally binding international protection mechanisms. Ultimately, this study emphasizes that safeguarding human rights in times of conflict requires more than rhetorical commitments it demands structural reforms in international law and collective political will.

• pdf